US Regulator’s Assault on Binance.US Leaves Firm Reeling
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has branded Binance.US "a cauldron of fraud," using its power and influence to choke off the firm’s banking relationships and USD fiat ramps, despite failing to produce any evidence to back up its claims in court. The interim chief of Binance.US told CoinDesk in an interview that the regulator’s actions have left the firm reeling, with thousands of customers lost and billions of dollars withdrawn from the exchange.
The SEC sued Binance and Binance.US, as well as their owner Changpeng Zhao, in June 2023 for charges including violations of securities laws. However, Binance agreed to a $4.3 billion settlement with U.S. authorities, and Zhao served some jail time unrelated to the SEC’s suit. Binance.US, a separate legal entity from Binance Global, was not involved in the settlement and remains locked in litigation stalemate with the SEC today.
"We’ll never get recompense for the damage the SEC did to us," said Norman Reed, interim CEO of Binance.US. "Within two weeks of that lawsuit, we’d lost thousands of customers, billions of dollars went out the door and we were later forced to lay off 70% of our staff. Institutions and banks ran away from us because the SEC said we were another fraudulent firm like FTX. It’s ironic that a U.S. financial regulator would essentially create a bank run at a company, which is what they did."
The firm has been operating as a crypto-to-crypto only exchange for over 18 months, with Reed stating that he expects to have USD fiat services revitalized and working in the next few weeks. Binance.US is poised for a dramatic comeback, courting partnerships with banks and in dialogue with state regulators once more.
Binance.US doesn’t want or need to play the victim, Reed added, having stoically carried on amid restraining orders, reporting obligations, and the loss of banking partners. However, in light of a new U.S. administration and the end of Gensler’s ultra-vindictive leadership at the SEC, Reed – himself a former regulatory officer at the SEC – wants to speak out about what he sees as an injustice.
"The DOJ looked at us, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District looked at us. The CFTC looked at us. OFAC and FinCEN looked at us – and when I say they ‘looked,’ I mean they did a thorough examination of us – but they all left us alone. We were outside of what happened to Binance Global and CZ. The only entity that went after us was the SEC," Reed said.
The debanking of crypto businesses, known colloquially as "Operation Chokepoint 2.0," has become a talking point of late, with high-profile figures such as Marc Andreessen and Brad Garlinghouse discussing it in public. The debanking of Binance.US is Chokepoint in action, Reed said, involving the SEC hitting up the exchange’s partners and fear-mongering with subpoenas.
Once the lawsuit was brought, the reputational risk was too high and payment processors backed away thanks to their correspondent banks being spooked, he said. "In the intervening period we approached hundreds of banks and financial institutions," Reed said. "None of them would bank us. Because we were a cauldron of fraud, according to the SEC."
Shortly after Binance.US was sued, the SEC attempted to put the firm out of business with a temporary restraining order that would have frozen all its assets, Reed said. The regulator claimed Binance.US was defrauding clients, abusing client accounts, and sending money overseas.
"But in court the SEC lawyers were forced to say they had found no evidence of this," Reed said. "Of course that didn’t stop them continuing to issue press releases about us. They are supposed to be the good guys, the regulators, wearing the white hats."
The one thing Binance.US does have in common with Binance.com is that Zhao (widely known as "CZ") remains the beneficial owner of both firms. Reed said it’s been months since he spoke to Zhao, recalling the time the then-Binance CEO asked him to take over the lead at Binance.US.
"At the time, I felt like I’d been nominated captain of the Titanic after it hit the iceberg, to go down with the ship," Reed said. "But we didn’t give up, and we’re a stronger company today than we’ve ever been. I’ve been telling my team for over a year that when we save this company and actually make it successful again, this will be some kind of case study."
Conclusion
The SEC’s assault on Binance.US has left the firm reeling, with thousands of customers lost and billions of dollars withdrawn from the exchange. The regulator’s actions have been widely criticized, with many arguing that they have unfairly targeted a legitimate business.
Reed’s account provides a detailed look at the impact of the SEC’s actions on Binance.US, highlighting the harm caused by the regulator’s use of its power and influence to choke off the firm’s banking relationships. The case has sparked debate about the need for greater regulation in the crypto space, as well as concerns about the potential for regulatory overreach.
As the situation continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the fate of Binance.US hangs in the balance. Will the firm be able to recover from the damage caused by the SEC’s actions? Only time will tell.